Skip to content

Who Are We Witnessing For?

On the Islamic Obligation to Know, to Look, and to Bear Witness — Even When Looking Is Uncomfortable


The Invisible Half  •  Article 2 of 5 “Who Are We Witnessing For?”

I.  The Woman Who Was Not Counted

In 2023, a team of researchers in Cox’s Bazar set out to map the most vulnerable people in the Rohingya refugee camps. They interviewed community members, healthcare workers, and camp leaders. They compiled data. They drew up a vulnerability index. And what they found, buried in their own findings, was something that should have been impossible: there were entire categories of women such as older women, women with disabilities, women living alone who had not appeared in any previous study. Not because they didn’t exist. Because no one had looked for them.

The researchers gave these women a name in their published paper. They called them ‘invisible to the humanitarian response.’

Invisible. In a camp housing over 900,000 people. In a crisis that has generated 34 peer-reviewed studies in a single decade. In a situation that the United Nations itself has described as bearing the hallmarks of genocide.1

They were there. They had always been there. They simply had not been witnessed.

This article is about that failure of witness and about what Islam has to say to a community that claims to care about justice but has, for the most part, not been watching.

II.  What We Did Not See

Before we can speak about obligation, we need to be honest about the gap. Not the gap in the camps but the gap in our knowledge of the camps. What do we, as a Myanmar Muslim community, actually know about the lives of Rohingya women? And what has the research been able to tell us?

A systematic review of the published literature on Rohingya women’s experiences (2014–2025) identified 34 rigorous studies spanning a decade of research across five academic databases. The majority (76.5%) of all included studies focused on a single location: Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh.2 Countries hosting significant Rohingya populations like Thailand, India, Indonesia produced no included studies at all. Entire displacement contexts remain, in the academic literature as in the public consciousness, essentially blank.

This is not simply a research gap. It is a mirror. The places where the world’s humanitarian infrastructure is most present are the places we know most about. The places where Rohingya women live without the scaffolding of international attention like the urban apartments in Kuala Lumpur where undocumented families hide from immigration enforcement, the informal settlements in Indian cities, the detention centres in Thailand are the places we know least about. Out of sight. Out of mind. Out of the research literature.

Before the 2017 exodus, only six studies on Rohingya women existed in the published literature. In the immediate aftermath of the crisis, that number grew rapidly. By 2025, 82.4% of all included studies had been published after the exodus.3 The research community responded but the response was concentrated in time and place overwhelmingly focused on Cox’s Bazar in the years immediately following 2017, with comparatively little attention to what came before, what is happening elsewhere, or what will happen next.

Almost no longitudinal studies exist to follow the same women over months and years to understand how lives change in prolonged displacement. Almost no studies focus on older women, on women with disabilities, or on women in settings outside the large camps.

Perhaps the most striking finding in the review is this: a 2023 study specifically designed to map vulnerability in the camps identified older women, women with disabilities, and female-headed households as ‘invisible to the humanitarian response.’4 These were not women who had arrived recently or were living in remote areas. They were women who had been in the camps for years and who had, despite years of humanitarian programming and research activity, never been adequately seen or served.

The research also found that women with restricted mobility had limited access to information about their own rights and available services because that information flowed through community channels dominated by men, and women who could not move freely could not reach those channels independently. Some women first learned about healthcare services available to them not from a health worker, not from a community notice, but from a male family member who decided to pass the information on or did not.

The women most in need of the humanitarian response were the women least visible to it.

III.  What Islam Says About Knowing

The word most commonly translated as ‘bear witness’ in Islamic discourse is shahāda. We know it from the declaration of faith: Ashhadu an lā ilāha illā Allāh. But shahāda carries a meaning that extends far beyond the personal declaration. In the Quran, it is also testimony, presence, and accountability — the act of being a witness to what happens in the world, and being held responsible for that witnessing.

Islam does not permit ignorance as a default state. The very first word revealed to the Prophet (ﷺ) was not ‘submit’ or ‘obey’ or ‘fight.’ It was:

اقْرَأْ بِاسْمِ رَبِّكَ الَّذِي خَلَقَ 
"Read in the name of your Lord who created." Qur'an 96:1 — the first revelation

The first command given to humanity’s final prophet was a command to engage with knowledge. And the Quran returns to this obligation again and again  not as an academic nicety but as a foundational act of worship.

قُلْ هَلْ يَسْتَوِي الَّذِينَ يَعْلَمُونَ وَالَّذِينَ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ 
"Say: Are those who know equal to those who do not know?" Qur'an 39:9

The rhetorical question expects one answer: no, they are not equal. Knowledge carries moral weight. The person who knows and does nothing is not in the same position as the person who genuinely did not know. But the Quran also closes that second door,the door of convenient ignorance with a precision that should make every Muslim uncomfortable:

وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا "Do not follow what you have no knowledge of. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart — all of these will be questioned." Qur'an 17:36

We will be asked about what we chose to look at. And  by clear implication about what we chose not to look at. Hearing, sight, and heart are named together, because witnessing is not only an intellectual act. It is a moral one. It engages the full person.

This individual obligation to know and to witness has a collective dimension in Islam that is particularly relevant to the situation of Rohingya women. Allah describes the Muslim community in the Quran with a specific and weighty title:

وَكَذَٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا لِّتَكُونُوا شُهَدَاءَ عَلَى النَّاسِ 
"And thus We have made you a middle [balanced] community so that you may be witnesses over the people." Qur'an 2:143

Shuhadāʾ ʿala al-nās is witnesses over the people. This is not a passive title. It is an active responsibility. The ummah is not simply a community of personal piety; it is a community charged with bearing witness to what happens in the world and, by extension, with responding to it. Muslim scholars understood this verse as establishing the Muslim community’s role as a moral witness before Allah on the Day of Judgment which implies that we will be asked about what we witnessed and what we did with that witnessing.

The Rohingya crisis has been unfolding for decades. The 2017 exodus, one million people crossing a border in weeks was not a quiet event. It was covered by international media, discussed in Muslim communities globally, and responded to with an outpouring of humanitarian concern. And yet, eight years later, most Muslims cannot name a single Rohingya woman. Cannot describe what her daily life looks like. Cannot say what she needs, what she has survived, or what the research tells us about her reality.

That is not witnessing. That is the performance of concern without the substance of knowledge.

The sunnah gives us a very different model. The Prophet ﷺ did not relate to the suffering of others through aggregate numbers or general categories. He knew people. He asked after them. He noticed when they were absent.

"A woman used to clean the mosque. The Prophet() asked about her, and was told she had died. He said: 'Why did you not tell me?' It was as if they had treated the matter as insignificant. He said: 'Show me her grave.' They showed him, and he prayed over her." Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, no. 458 — graded Ṣaḥīḥ

She was a woman who cleaned the mosque. She had no apparent status. She died, and the community judged her death not significant enough to mention to the Prophet (ﷺ). And he corrected them not with anger, but with presence. He went to her grave. He prayed over her. He made her visible in death because she deserved to have been visible in life.

He also asked about people he had not seen recently not out of social courtesy but out of genuine concern. Anas ibn Mālik narrated that the Prophet (ﷺ) would notice if a companion had been absent and would inquire after them. He is recorded asking about a young companion’s sparrow, about the health of a Companion’s mother, about a child’s wellbeing. He witnessed the people around him not as a category but as individuals.

The question this poses to us is not a comfortable one: when did we last ask after a Rohingya woman by name? When did we last consider that her death, her illness, her hunger, her survival, any of it, was significant enough to bring to our community’s attention?

There is a verse in the Quran that the Muslim community does not quote often enough in this context. It comes in Surah al-Nisāʾ, in a passage about justice and accountability, and it names exactly the category of person we are discussing:

وَمَا لَكُمْ لَا تُقَاتِلُونَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَالْمُسْتَضْعَفِينَ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ وَالنِّسَاءِ وَالْوِلْدَانِ الَّذِينَ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا أَخْرِجْنَا مِنْ هَٰذِهِ الْقَرْيَةِ الظَّالِمِ أَهْلُهَا 
"And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children who say: 'Our Lord, take us out of this city of oppressive people.'" Qur'an 4:75

The Arabic word used here is al-mustaḍʿafīn – the ones who have been made weak, the ones who have been oppressed into vulnerability. And the Quran names them specifically: men, women, and children. Not a general mass. People who are praying to be taken out of a city of oppression. People with voices, with prayers, with a specific request directed at Allah.

The verse does not ask us simply to be aware of them. It asks what is the matter with us that we are not responding. The Arabic construction – wa mā lakum – carries a tone of gentle but searching challenge. It is not a condemnation. It is an invitation to examine ourselves.

The mustaḍʿafūn of our time include Rohingya women in Cox’s Bazar. They are praying to be taken out of a city, a camp, a condition of oppression. They have been praying this for eight years. What is the matter with us?

They are praying to be taken out. They have been praying for eight years. The verse does not ask whether we heard them. It asks what is the matter with us that we have not responded.

IV.  The Honest Conversation

The Muslim world’s response to the 2017 Rohingya crisis was, in many ways, admirable. Mosques collected donations. Islamic charities mobilised. Social media filled with prayers and solidarity. For several weeks in August and September of 2017, the Rohingya were at the centre of Muslim consciousness globally.

And then, gradually, they weren’t.

This is not a uniquely Muslim failure and it reflects a well-documented pattern in how human attention responds to ongoing crises. The psychological research on ‘compassion fade’ shows that sustained attention to suffering is genuinely difficult. The news cycle moves on. The emotional urgency fades. Life continues.

But Islam does not grant us permission to let our obligations fade with our feelings. The crisis did not end in 2017. It did not end in 2020. It has not ended today. Over one million Rohingya remain in Cox’s Bazar as you read this. Humanitarian funding for the response has been declining. Essential services have been cut. The conditions that produced the original exodus; statelessness, persecution, denial of rights remain unresolved in Myanmar.

One of the most challenging findings in the systematic review is that the research exists. Thirty-four peer-reviewed studies, published over a decade, documenting in careful detail what Rohingya women are experiencing, what barriers they face, what interventions work, and what the evidence says needs to happen. The knowledge was not hidden. It was simply not sought.

Muslim communities globally have access to this research. Islamic scholars, educators, imams, parents, youth leaders all of them could have engaged with this evidence and translated it into community knowledge and action. The gap is not in the evidence. It is in the bridge between evidence and community.

This series is an attempt to build part of that bridge. But the bridge requires people on both sides. Reading this article is the beginning of witnessing. What you do after reading it determines whether witnessing leads anywhere.

The Prophet (ﷺ) described the scholar who knows and does not teach as someone whose knowledge is a burden rather than a blessing. The obligation to spread beneficial knowledge to make the invisible visible for the communities we lead is not optional. Friday sermons that never mention the Rohingya crisis. Islamic education that teaches justice in the abstract but not in the specific. Community fundraising that responds to proximity and emotion rather than to documented need. These are patterns worth examining.

Children learn what we choose to teach them and what we choose not to. The Companion Zayd ibn Thābit was taught Hebrew by the Prophet (ﷺ) so that he could understand the other so that the Muslim community could engage with a world beyond its own immediate circle. We can teach our children to extend that same curiosity and care across the borders that separate them from their brothers and sisters in Cox’s Bazar.

The research found something quietly hopeful alongside everything difficult: the interventions that were tried like midwife-led birthing centres, community referral systems, psychosocial support groups  worked. When people paid attention and directed resources toward what the evidence showed was needed, outcomes improved.

The problem was never that the solution was impossible. The problem was that not enough people were watching.

V.  What Witnessing Actually Looks Like

Witnessing is not passive. In Islam it carries legal, moral, and spiritual weight. Here are concrete starting points for turning knowledge into the kind of witness that Islam demands.

1.  Learn the specific, not just the general.  The research names specific conditions, specific barriers, specific interventions. ‘The Rohingya are suffering’ is not witnessing. Knowing that over 63% of adolescent Rohingya girls reported food shortages during the pandemic, that women require male permission to access contraception, that older women were invisible to the humanitarian response that is witnessing. This series is a starting point. Let it lead you further.

2.  Speak the names in the spaces you lead.  Imams, teachers, parents, youth group leaders: the people in your community know what you consider important by what you choose to mention. The Prophet (ﷺ) asked after a woman who cleaned the mosque when no one else did. What we name in our Friday sermons, our halaqas, our family dinner conversations that is what becomes real to the people who listen to us.

3.  Direct resources toward documented need.  Islamic charities working directly with Rohingya women exist. Midwife-led birthing centres, psychosocial support programmes, and community referral systems have been shown by the research to save lives. Zakat and sadaqa directed by evidence rather than by marketing is a more faithful form of giving. Ask the charities you support: what does your work with Rohingya women specifically look like? What does the evidence say you should be doing?

4.  Challenge the forgetting when you see it.  When a crisis disappears from Muslim social media, from mosque programming, from community conversation that disappearance is a choice, not a natural event. Naming it gently and bringing the conversation back is itself an act of witness. ‘Did you know the situation in Cox’s Bazar has actually worsened?’ is a sentence that costs nothing to say and may change what someone pays attention to.

5.  Understand that proximity is not a prerequisite for obligation.  The Prophet (ﷺ) responded to suffering he did not personally witness. He sent resources to people he had never met. He prayed for communities he would never visit. Physical distance is not a moral excuse. In an age where a research paper published in Bangladesh can be read in Birmingham, Kuala Lumpur, and Houston on the same morning, the claim that we did not know is harder to sustain than ever.

VI.  The Question the Verse Leaves With Us

Surah al-Ḥujurāt — the surah about the ethics of community — contains a verse that most Muslims know well and that most Muslims apply, instinctively, to their immediate circle:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اجْتَنِبُوا كَثِيرًا مِّنَ الظَّنِّ إِنَّ بَعْضَ الظَّنِّ إِثْمٌ ۖ وَلَا تَجَسَّسُوا وَلَا يَغْتَب بَّعْضُكُم بَعْضًا "O you who have believed, avoid much suspicion, for indeed some suspicion is sin. And do not spy on one another, and do not backbite one another." Qur'an 49:12

We understand this verse as applying to the neighbour, the colleague, the fellow Muslim we interact with daily. But the surah opens with a different kind of attention not suspicious scrutiny, but the careful, respectful notice of the other:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُم مِّن ذَكَرٍ وَأُنثَىٰ وَجَعَلْنَاكُمْ شُعُوبًا وَقَبَائِلَ لِتَعَارَفُوا "O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you into peoples and tribes so that you may know one another." Qur'an 49:13

Litaʿārafū- so that you may know one another. Not so that you may be aware of one another in the abstract. Not so that you may feel general goodwill toward the concept of other peoples. So that you may actually know them. The diversity of peoples and tribes is not an obstacle to unity in this verse and it is the occasion for the deeper unity that comes from genuine knowledge of the other.

Rohingya women are a people. They are a tribe in the Qur’anic sense,  a community with a history, a language, a culture, a set of experiences that are specific and real and documented. Allah created them as He created you, and He created the diversity between you so that you would have a reason to reach across it and know them.

This series exists because knowing them begins with knowing what their lives are actually like. The research has done part of that work. This article has shared some of what the research found. What you do next whether you keep reading, whether you share what you have learned, whether you direct your attention and resources toward the invisible half that is the witnessing that the Qur’an calls you to.

They are not invisible to Allah. The question is whether they will remain invisible to us.

ABOUT THE SERIES
The Invisible Half is a five-part Islamic educational series drawing on a peer-reviewed systematic literature review of 34 studies on Rohingya women's experiences (2014–2025). Each article translates research findings into Islamic ethical reflection and practical community guidance. Article 1 — 'When Protection Becomes a Prison'  examines distorted guardianship and male gatekeeping. Article 3 examines early and forced marriage. Articles 4 and 5 address mental health and the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah respectively.

NOTES & REFERENCES

1 Sultana, R., Nasar, S., Parray, A. A., & Haque, M. E. (2023). ‘We are invisible to them’ — Identifying the most vulnerable groups in humanitarian crises during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Rohingyas and the host communities of Cox’s Bazar. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(2), Article e0000451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000451

2 Systematic review finding: 26 of 34 included studies (76.5%) focused on Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. No studies in the final sample focused specifically on Rohingya women in Thailand, India, Indonesia, or other host countries.

3 Systematic review finding: 28 of 34 included studies (82.4%) were published after the August 2017 exodus.

4 Sultana et al. (2023), op. cit. The study developed a gender-based vulnerability index identifying older women, women with disabilities, and female-headed households as ‘invisible to the humanitarian response.’

All Qur’anic translations follow Mustafa Khattab (The Clear Quran) with minor adaptation for clarity. All hadith gradings are as cited from primary collections.

The Invisible Half

When Protection Becomes a Prison

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *